Yogyakarta and Its Special Fascination: Iconic Landmarks, Memories, Hopes, and Challenges
Abstract
This study discusses the Tugu Pal Putih as a symbol of cultural identity and branding of the city of Yogyakarta through visual elements, expressions, and discussions on Instagram social media. The research was carried out
qualitatively with a netnography approach and visual analysis of Instagram content related to this cultural landmark. The analysis is done through a thematic coding process to identify dominant themes and patterns reflecting public perceptions. The study results show that Tugu Pal Putih is not just a physical landmark but also a symbol of pride that forms a collective memory and emotional connection to Yogyakarta's atmosphere. Themes such as longing, ideal city, and pride reflect strong public attachment. Despite its distinctiveness, issues like hot weather and traffic congestion present challenges that require adaptive strategies. The integration of cultural, visual, and emotional elements enhances city identity and supports effective city branding. These findings offer insight for branding management to maintain the uniqueness of Yogyakarta as a cultural place.
References
J. P. Siregar, “The multi-layered identity of a city: Articulating citizens’ and place identities in Yogyakarta as the city of philosophy,” TATALOKA, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 746–754, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.14710/tataloka.21.4.746-754.
A. S. Sadana and A. I. Wibisono, “Introducing landmarks: The Tugu Yogyakarta’s popularity in literature review and online media,” J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Stud., vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 45–59, 2024, doi: 10.32996/jhsss.2024.6.11.4.
A. Wipranata and L. J. Tjung, “The influence of Yogyakarta’s philosophical axis on city spatial,” in Proc. 2nd Tarumanagara Int. Conf. Appl. Social Sci. Humanit. (TICASH 2020), 2020, pp. 277–283, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.201209.040.
S. Issundari, Y. M. Yani, R. W. S. Sumadinata, and R. D. Heryadi, “From local to global: Positioning identity of Yogyakarta, Indonesia through cultural paradiplomacy,” Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 177–187, May 2021, doi: 10.36941/ajis-2021-0074.
A. S. Sadana, L. E. Prasetya, and A. P. Dharmaraty, “Citra visual Tugu Pal Putih sebagai landmark Kota Yogyakarta - Visual image of Tugu Pal Putih as a landmark of Yogyakarta City,” J. Latar, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 63–71, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.69749/jl.v2i1.66.
A. Y. Haryono, “Penanda kawasan sebagai penguat nilai filosofis Sumbu Utama Kota Yogyakarta,” Atrium J. Arsit., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 93–107, 2015, doi: 10.21460/atrium.v1i2.86.
S. Felasari and M. S. Roychansyah, “Capability of social media in structuring collective memory for future urban design project,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:56234162
B. Setiadi, R. Setiawati, M. Manalu, R. Dewantara, and A. Y. Vandika, “Analysis of the impact of mobile application implementation and social media on increasing tourist visits in Yogyakarta,” West Sci. Interdiscip. Stud., 2024, doi: 10.58812/wsis.v2i07.1114.
S. K. Deb and N. Mallik, “Effects of social media in tourism marketing: Outlook on user generated content,” J. Digit. Mark. Commun., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 49–65, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.53623/jdmc.v3i2.316.
M. Williams and T. Moser, “The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research,” Int. Manag. Rev., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 45–55, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:198662452
M. Naeem, W. Ozuem, K. E. Howell, and S. Ranfagni, “A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 22, pp. 1–18, 2023, doi: 10.1177/16094069231205789.
M. Dawborn-Gundlach and J. Pesina, “Thematic analysis of qualitative data using diverse yet complementary approaches,” in Contemp. Approaches to Res. Math., Sci., Health Environ. Educ., 2015, pp. 1–8. [Online]. Available:
https://www.deakin.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/622556/Dawborn-Grundlach-Pesina-2015.pdf
Z. Chen, “Ethics and discrimination in artificial intelligence-enabled recruitment practices,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 567, 2023, doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-02079-x.
Kratonjogja.id, “Sumbu Filosofi Yogyakarta, Pengejawantahan Asal dan Tujuan Hidup,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.kratonjogja.id/tata-rakiting/21-sumbu-filosofi-yogyakarta-pengejawantahan-asal-dan-tujuan-hidup/
U. Priyono, Yogyakarta: City Of Philosophy. Yogyakarta: Dinas Kebudayaan, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Buku_profil_Yogyakarta_city_of_philosoph.html?id=O2GfnQAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
H. Lismayanti, M. Mintowati, and A. Ahmadi, “Pemberdayaan bahasa banjar melalui pemasyarakatan bahasa Indonesia,” Briliant J. Ris. Konsept., vol. 5, no. 3, p. 457, 2020, doi: 10.28926/briliant.v5i3.480.
KBBI, “Istimewa,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://kbbi.web.id/istimewa
nomor.net, “Stasiun Yogyakarta,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://m.nomor.net/_kodepos.php?_i=republik-indonesia&id=43172
E. N. Khasanah and N. H. Rohman, “Analysis of the agriculture sector role in economic growth in Gunungkidul District, Special Region of Yogyakarta,” Khazanah Intelekt., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 171–183, 2024.
Copyright (c) 2025 RUSTIC: Jurnal Arsitektur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
