Evaluation of the Greenship GBCI Implementation in the Appropriate Land Use Category for the New Building of Poltekkes Riau Tower
Abstract
Implementing the green building concept is a strategic solution to support sustainable development, particularly in the construction sector, which significantly contributes to environmental degradation. In Indonesia, the Green Building Council Indonesia (GBCI) has established the Greenship rating tool as a standard for green buildings, including the Land Use Efficiency category. Menara Poltekkes Riau was selected as the research object because it is a new building aligned with sustainable development principles as stipulated in the Decree of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number HK.01.07/MENKES/550/2024. This study aims to evaluate the application of the Land Use Efficiency category, measure the level of achievement, and provide recommendations for improvement. The research employs a mixed-method approach (quantitative and qualitative), with data collected through field observations and an As-built Drawing document study. The evaluation results indicate that Menara Poltekkes Riau achieved 5 out of 17 points or 5% of the total points in the Land Use Efficiency category. The criteria achieved include Basic Green Area (ASD-P) Benchmark 1A, Site Selection (ASD-1) Benchmark 1A, Community Accessibility (ASD-2) Benchmark 1, Public Transportation (ASD-3) Benchmark 1A, and Microclimate (ASD-6) Benchmarks 1A and 2. However, other criteria have not been met, including optimizing green areas, vegetation, transportation facilities, accessibility, and stormwater runoff management. This study emphasizes the importance of improving these aspects to enhance the application of the green building concept at Menara Poltekkes Riau.
References
BPS, “PDB Tahun 2022.” [Online]. Available: https://www.bps.go.id/id
“Not All Green Buildings Are Made Equal: Green Building Construction Cost Premium,” 2022, doi: 10.35483/acsa.am.110.1.
GBCI, Green Building Greenship Penjelasan Green Building. PT. Sucofindo.
C. C. Ohueri, W. I. Enegbuma, and R. Kenley, “Energy efficiency practices for Malaysian green office building occupants,” Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag., 2018, doi: 10.1108/bepam-10-2017-0091.
N. Vejaratnam, Z. F. Mohamad, and S. Chenayah, “A systematic review of barriers impeding the implementation of government green procurement,” J. Public Procure., 2020, doi: 10.1108/jopp-02-2020-0013.
A. A. Amalia, C. A. Amal, and S. F. A. Amin, “Evaluasi aspek tepat guna lahan pada Mall Nipah Makassar dengan menggunakan Greenship rating tools,” no. December, pp. C007–C014, 2018, doi: 10.32315/sem.3.c007.
I. M. Purwaamijaya, R. M. Masri, T. R. Hanandita, and A. Sekar, “Bangunan pendidikan pada tahap konstruksi (studi kasus: Gedung FPEB, Gedung FPSD, dan Gedung Pascasarjana UPI Bandung),” J. Pengabdi. Masy. Tek., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 82–90, 2024, doi: 10.24853/jpmt.6.2.82-90.
S. Suripto, M. H. Abdi, and E. H. Manurung, “Evaluasi penerapan green construction proyek pembangunan gedung rektorat Kampus UIII,” J. Talent. Sipil, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 134, 2022, doi: 10.33087/talentasipil.v5i1.106.
I. Ardhiansyah and R. Azizah, “Pengukuran Greenship New Building Ver. 1.2 pada bangunan baru Rumah Atsiri Indonesia (final assessment),” 2020, doi: 10.23917/sinektika.v15i2.9864.
V. Basten, I. Crévits, Y. Latief, and M. A. Berawi, “Conceptual development of cost benefit analysis based on regional, knowledge, and economic aspects of green building,” Int. J. Technol., 2019, doi: 10.14716/ijtech.v10i1.1791.
A. K. Shah, J. Yu, D. Sukamani, and M. Kusi, “How green transformational leadership influences sustainability? Mediating effects of green creativity and green procurement,” J. Innov. Sustain. Risus, 2021, doi: 10.23925/2179-3565.2020v11i4p69-87.
D. Willar, E. V. Y. Waney, D. D. G. Pangemanan, and R. Mait, “Sustainable construction practices in the execution of infrastructure projects,” Smart Sustain. Built Environ., 2020, doi: 10.1108/sasbe-07-2019-0086.
World Green Building Council, “World Green Building Week 2023,” Word Green Building, 2023, pp. 1–7.
D. J. van de Ven et al., “The potential land requirements and related land use change emissions of solar energy,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82042-5.
G. Jin et al., “Trade-offs in land-use competition and sustainable land development in the North China Plain,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 141, pp. 36–46, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.004.
J. Chang, W. Wang, and J. Liu, “Industrial upgrading and its influence on green land use efficiency,” Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29928-8.
H. Long and Y. Qu, “Land use transitions and land management: A mutual feedback perspective,” Land Use Policy, vol. 74, pp. 111–120, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.021.
Q. Zhao et al., “Multifunction change of rural housing land in metropolitan suburbs from the perspective of farmer households’ land-use behavior,” Land Use Policy, vol. 119, p. 106206, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106206.
Y. Liu, J. Li, and Y. Yang, “Strategic adjustment of land use policy under the economic transformation,” Land Use Policy, vol. 74, pp. 5–14, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.005.
Y. Zhou, X. Li, and Y. Liu, “Rural land system reforms in China: History, issues, measures and prospects,” Land Use Policy, vol. 91, p. 104330, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104330.
K. Kandita, E. Akmalah, and I. Irawati, “Kajian kategori tepat guna lahan dalam penerapan konsep green building di ITENAS,” Potensi J. Sipil Politek., vol. 20, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.35313/potensi.v20i1.999.
S. E. Q. Safitri, A. Trisiana, and A. Ratnaningsih, “Evaluasi green building berdasarkan Greenship untuk bangunan baru versi 1.2 (studi kasus: Masjid Al-Hikmah Universitas Jember),” J. Appl. Civ. Eng. Infrastruct. Technol., 2022, doi: 10.52158/jaceit.v3i1.282.
Erizal, Y. Chadirin, and I. M. Furi, “Evaluasi aspek green building pada Gedung Andi Hakim Nasoetion Rektorat IPB,” J. Manajemen Aset Infrastruktur & Fasilitas, 2019, doi: 10.12962/j26151847.v3i2.5888.
A. R. Adi and E. Ernawati, “Kajian penilaian Greenship GBCI dalam menunjang pembelajaran arsitektur hijau,” J. Teknol. dan Desain, 2020, doi: 10.51170/jtd.v2i1.41.
A. K. Dewi, “Analisis tingkat kekumuhan dan kualitas hidup masyarakat di permukiman Situ Citayam,” Vitruvian, 2022, doi: 10.22441/vitruvian.2022.v11i2.003.
A. Ratnaningsih, A. Hasanuddin, and R. Hermansa, “Penilaian kriteria green building pada pembangunan gedung IsDB Project berdasarkan skala indeks menggunakan Greenship versi 1.2 (studi kasus: Gedung Engineering Biotechnology Universitas Jember),” Berk. SAINSTEK, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 59, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.19184/bst.v7i2.12153.
L. Banowati et al., “Pendekatan holistik dalam mengidentifikasi kendala implementasi green construction di Indonesia,” Berk. SAINSTEK, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–12, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010196.
T. A. Krishanty and S. Herlambang, “Konsep adaptasi re-use dan biophilic pada revitalisasi bangunan bersejarah (kasus Hellendoorn Tunjungan, Surabaya),” J. Sains Teknol. Urban Peranc. Arsit., 2023, doi: 10.24912/stupa.v4i2.21721.
P. T. Prayudho, “Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa dengan penerapan problem based learning berbantu Google Classroom,” PPM, 2024, doi: 10.47134/ppm.v1i2.324.
Copyright (c) 2025 RUSTIC: Jurnal Arsitektur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
